The term “superorganic” was probably first used by the early sociologist Herbert of the time, Alfred Kroeber and Edward Sapir, in the American Anthropologist. The idea of “The superorganic” is associated with Alfred Kroeber, an American anthropologist writing in the first half of the twentieth century. Why the Superorganic Concept Serves the Human Sciences Badly. Peter J. Richerson University of California – Los Angeles. Los Angeles . Dobzhansky’s usage was probably inspired Kroeber and kindred influential social. scientists of his.
|Published (Last):||9 January 2008|
|PDF File Size:||18.7 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.14 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
All living things, plants and animals, are built up of inorganic elements, mainly hydrogen, oxygen and carbon, plus some trace elements.
Similarly, the dog, if seen as a biological system, operates at a higher complexity than the inorganic elements which comprise it. Do not anthropomorphise culture.
Those are carried by individuals. Culture and society comprise the third level.
The links are symbolic, not genetic as in biological systems. It operates at a higher level of complexity than the organic.
They have developed communications between themselves to an elaborate degree, much more sophisticated than other animals. If we start with the inorganic, it is the physical universe, all the atoms of elements without iroeber.
The arrangement makes them alive. Looking at the relationship between living things and their inorganic components in this way helps us to understand the relationship between superorganifo and persons.
Culture as the superorganic
The second level of complexity is composed of living things. They behave, however, in concert with each other, as a system external to individuals —— society. Human beings are animals, and as such are organic systems. Humans have thoughts and behaviour.
If you copy text from this site, please acknowledge the author s and link it back to cec. We can call this the lowest level of complexity. This elaboration links humans together into communities and societies.
If you separate the dog or tree into its separate elements, it dies. The socio-cultural level, culture or society, therefore is carried by humans and transcends humans. Do not think of a dog as a carbon atom or superorgnaico hydrocarbon molecule.
It may have a life of its own, but its life more resembles an amoeba than a human. The superorganic is another way of describing —— and understanding —— culture or the socio-cultural system.
There is a parallel, therefore, in the relations between the inorganic and the organic, as between the organic and the superorganic. Key Words Modules Sociology: Knowing the dynamics of how carbon atoms operate, or that combining hydrogen and oxygen can result in a rapid combustion if not an explosion, does not explain how the tree works, with its leaves converting sunlight into energy to change water and carbon dioxide into oxygen and carbon, channels to transfer sap from leaves to root, and so on.
A living entity transcends its inorganic parts. If you analyse all those parts, in themselves, or even as a kkroeber, they are not living.
Similarly, do not think of a community, an institution, a society as a human being.